Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
There’s a famous quote which promulgates students as the future of tomorrow and nation. Indeed, students are future professors, researchers, entrepreneurs, artists and leaders. And this journey from a student to a successful working professional requires skills, time, patience and competencies. The prompt above propels that every student must be required to take variety of courses which lie beyond the domain of their major. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue that students should take courses outside of their intended major fields for reasons stated below.
To begin, often in career life people change their line of work or gain interest in some other field. This change of direction can be aided by the courses taken during the university duration. This is so because the future career professional will know his/her interests and disinterests and thus, not feel lost with sudden career change. For instance, during my undergraduate years I took an additional course of environmental science which apprised me about the severe impact of global warming and take part in several cleaning campaigns.
Moreover, such courses often add to personal growth and personality development. For instance, a behavioural psychology course offered by my undergraduate university helped my friends to understand human functioning and several factors associated with it. This allowed them to improve their communication and better emotional intelligence competencies. Such courses help students get out of their shell and develop confidence needed for professional growth.
Further, taking courses outside the major allows space for professional growth both in present and future. It helps in forming connections and social networks which are useful for growth in career. Moreover, the skills and competencies learned during the course prepares students for ever evolving job market. For example, today’s marketing domain focuses on social media where as 10 years back marketing would be more television centric. Therefore, courses allow for acclimatizing to changing social world.
Courses taken outside the university classes further aid in expanding knowledge and increase creative thinking among the blooming minds. For instance, freedom to choose courses will allow students to explore their interests without pressure of examinations. This freedom will succor students in forming, maintaining and proliferating their identity.
Most importantly, these courses can be both study oriented or skills oriented. Such format will advance human race and student’s perceptions about the world. Therefore, Universities must require their students to broaden their horizon and take courses outside of their field of study.
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 50
- Alta Manufacturing 43
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 66
- Cooperation then competition 50
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...arketing domain focuses on social media where as 10 years back marketing would be more t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75490196078 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87051976105 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2204860643 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374922730858 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103272326688 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860610986881 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20602391919 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125132436619 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.