Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Universities play an important role in expanding the mind of an individual. Students gain the knowledge required for their respective careers and step into the real world. I think it would be prolific to study courses outside one’s area of study as it makes one more productive intellectually. It would help the students better understand and focus on their own subject. Universities should make it a requirement to pick diverse subjects other than their core ones.
At times, students feel bored and exhausted while studying the same subject for a prolonged time. Having a list of varied subjects on their curriculum would offer a fresh perspective and a break from the quotidian. Moreover, an eclectic course schedule will only extend their area of knowledge. For example, if a student’s principal field of study is Spanish, then going for an optional course of Linguistics would help them understand their subject better and give them a new knowledge base.
Furthermore, being limited to one subject often leads students losing interest in it through the repetitive study of the same. Electing different subject courses, I think would be helpful in maintaining their interest and concentration in their chosen field of interest.
Although this policy might have more advantages than disadvantages, it is important to note that it can result in distracting the students from their main goal (core subjects). Oftentimes, students take optional subjects and become more engrossed in them instead of focusing on their main subjects. This can prove to be harmful in their overall performance. Apart from this, if a student has no interest other than his/her own field, it would be a distraction to study other subjects and might affect their results.
Hence, universities must include this policy but with an exception that the students should not be graded on these extra subjects, as it can prove to affect their performance and results. It should only be put in place to help them expand their knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | sunpeach | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Daffodilia | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Gaurav Singla | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | loquats | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 83
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In devel 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the pos 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...erest and concentration in their chosen field of interest. Although this policy...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, then, while, apart from, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22085889571 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86027113495 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.08608742 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.117647059 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128033244646 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051501244948 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329644760528 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845875024905 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286283409899 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.