A university education should be provided free of charge to all interested scholars.Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Use examples and reasons to support your position.

The university education give several courses for students who are pursuing their dream. Especially, the university education aims to serve curriculum to cultivate experts of the various fields. However, in virtue of its high tuition, many students are deprived of the chances to enter university. So that the issue about the government's support for university of education needs to be considered seriously.

In case that the government support selectively for students who are suffering financial difficulty, the university education free of charge would be beneficial both for the society as whole and for individuals. The free university education can contribute to actualize the value of equality in education. For example, by supporting tuition which is normally considerably expensive for the students who are in destitute condition, the government can grant the opportunity of high level of education which would be impossible without the acid. And this opportunity of education plays important role in enhancing happiness of individuals, owing to the fact that the university education works as salient ground for future success. Furthermore, it is eventually advantageous for the whole society, because with this monetary support, diverse students who have great potentiality but are suffering difficulty can have chances to be well educated, and it leads to generate good human resource pool which is necessary for the progress of the society. For instance, Kim Buseong, who is renown business man of Korea, had been helped by government for university, so that he could be a figure who gives huge positive effect on the society.

However, even though the scholarship provided for students who are in poor condition is laudable, the attempt to introduce the university education system operated without any tuition should not be accepted. Because it is not realistic and even it would be harmful for the society as a whole. High quality of education requires enormous amount of finance. If the government take responsibility for all tuition needed to run university education, the burden of the government will be as huge as impossible to deal with, or the quality of the education would be abjured. For example, in Korea, government is trying to cover many proportion of university tuition, but this excessive attempts eventually is expected to gives negative repercussion on the quality of education, because it reduce the freedom of running the finance of university. And the worse quality of education means the damaged prospects of the development of the nation.

All in all, the university education should not be free of charge. It is not realistic and practical. However, for individuals and society both, the system to help students who are in destitute condition should be operated.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun proportion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many proportions'.
Suggestion: many proportions
...in Korea, government is trying to cover many proportion of university tuition, but this excessi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'give'.
Suggestion: give
...sive attempts eventually is expected to gives negative repercussion on the quality of...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 784, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...on the quality of education, because it reduce the freedom of running the finance of u...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37641723356 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99743738707 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462585034014 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6078259891 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.789473684 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193054034542 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828711950555 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764555443404 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154538383449 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381402299909 0.0667264976115 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.