The university education is salient for society and individuals both. Because the program supplies the opportunities to be experts in various fields. However, because of the high tuition of the education in university, some students lose the chance to be educated at the university.
In the case that the government supports students who are in destitute condition, the education served free of charge would be beneficial for both the society and the individuals. First, the society can enjoy advantages from helping students who are in poor condition but have outstanding potentiality. By financially supporting them, government can cultivate the students who will be abundant human resource which is necessary for the development of the nation. For example, in 1980's in the South Korea, government arduously supported many young and intelligent students for university education. And this investment eventually became the durable ground for the rapid growth of the nation's economy. Moreover, with the government's support for poor students who can not afford paying the tuition, the nation can achieve the value of equality in education. And with the equality, many individual can have secure their prowess from the university education. Therefore it also contributes to enhancing the happiness of individuals.
However, the free university education for all students is not realistic. First of all, the policy to support all students consumes excessively huge money. There are no proper ways to secure that large amount of budget, unless the quality of the education is relinquished. For instance, the representative country where one actually takes policy to actualize the free university is Germany. The nation is one of the most wealthy country of the world, but they also are worrying about the financial burden to cover all to cover all the tuition needed to manage university education. If the economy size is smaller than Germany, the policy to materialize the free education would be more difficult.
Moreover, free education of university is deleterious to the society as whole. Because it will distort the economy structure. The free University education will attract more students to enter the programs. And the students who graduate from the universities wish to find job proper for the graduated students. But, to sustain stable and healthy economy of the nation, the workers who works in diverse fields are required. The policy to support all students will give negative repercussion by absorbing more people into university than the natural economy allows. And this distorted economy will make suffering environment for individuals as well.
All in all, the selective supports for the poor students will be helpful for the society and the individual. However, because the blindly supporting for all students who wish to enter the university will be implausible. Because it is not financially realistic, and it will distort the structure of economy.
- A university education should be provided free of charge to all interested scholars.Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Use examples and reasons to support your position. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 54
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 77
- Issue Task 28 The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lient for society and individuals both. Because the program supplies the opportunities ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...development of the nation. For example, in 1980s in the South Korea, government arduousl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 684, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...able ground for the rapid growth of the nations economy. Moreover, with the governments...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 777, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to pay'.
Suggestion: to pay
...rt for poor students who can not afford paying the tuition, the nation can achieve the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 956, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... prowess from the university education. Therefore it also contributes to enhancing the ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to materialize the free education would be more difficult. Moreover, free ed...
^^
Line 8, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is deleterious to the society as whole. Because it will distort the economy structure. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42672413793 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90796895484 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 815.4 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2145654413 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.2592592593 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1851851852 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185486866116 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654759794288 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525328079711 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125511463365 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282458308157 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.