We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Life is all about learning; and we do learn from nature and people with whom we are surrounded but here a thesis says that we can learn relatively more from people of whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. And I agree with this statement for following two reasons, but also disagree because if one has decided to learn from those whose views are contradictory, then oneself can definitely learn more from those also.
It is necessary to have communication and adequate bonding to learn from people. If we know the person adequately, we can understand what are the strength and weakness that person possess. As we share most of the time with our colleague and partner and we come across many situations, either challenging or easygoing, and everyone does have a different approach of tackling and manipulating that. So, it might happen that, someone’s approach may be better than other one, which gives an opportunity to learn for a person whose approach relatively lacking. If person who is better with approach, is congenial to one, who is lacking, then they can share their strategies without any hesitant. This sharing help to learn and improve oneself without putting much energy on other aspects, which may come across if person is not congenial.
Two people having same ideology and view opens the path to discuss and share their perspectives but if one has some contradicting opinion then that will give a counterpoint to the situations which open ups the knowledge bank to the thoughts, and may help one to think in all around, and it is a necessity to think all around in life to take wise decision. However, this can only be possible if the person is quite determined to accept the counterpoints or views from the other side of the table. If person with the contradictory views is a congenial, then transaction may be relatively smooth if the person is not congenial. Therefore, having a congenial relation with someone may help someone to learn more, and it has also proven by few researchers in their research that, one is not just a himself/herself but combination of people with which oneself is surrounded.
If person, who want to learn or naïve, is quite determined to learn and have patience to bare as well as person with a contradictory view is someone well established and over-achiever or mastered in his/her field, then learnings from master might be quite beneficent. For example, consider an any sports where people do play against each other but at the end of the game, they share their experiences and do give suggestions to the younger ones. Therefore, quality of learning may be high from a person with the contradictory views.
In the conclusion, we share most of time of our life with the loved ones who might share the same views or might not, but we learn from those and goes forward in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...lf can definitely learn more from those also. It is necessary to have communication...
^^^^
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'himself'?
Suggestion: a; himself
...in their research that, one is not just a himself/herself but combination of people with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81135902637 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74895544618 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444219066937 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5717443015 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8125 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444203933218 0.243740707755 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151424810911 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168125652926 0.0758088955206 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287208923164 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199516026826 0.0667264976115 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.