We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Knowledge is the only way a person can move forward. Anything or anybody could be a source of knowledge if the person truly wants to learn something. Saying that we can learn more from the people who share your own perspective than people who contradict your views is very shallow. Knowledge in any form can be a great source of inspiration, its source does not matter.
Human being have evolved and developed because we learn from our mistake and because many courageous people had the audacity to go against the standard norms of the society and proved everyone wrong. If we would have not accepted such people just because they had different perspective, we would not have developed this far. Everybody has a right to have their own ideology and perspective and that’s what makes everyone of us “unique”, and we have to respect their thoughts and learn from them even if they do not match our ideology.
There are numerous scientific inventions that were inspired from different failed inventions. If they were only considered fail, then we would have much fewer innovations. There is sometimes no right way of attaining something, you have to take your own method and learn from the people who have tried to attain the same even with a different approach.
We can take example of Ramanujan, the Indian mathematician who was heavily criticized during his because of his unorthodox method of reaching to conclusion without any derivational proof, but his theories and formulas are still relevant in the field of Black hole, proving that he was right all along. If the scientific community had shown a little faith in Ramanujan then we would have been much ahead in many scientific fields. Similarly decades later when men reached moon and thousands of space explorations later, there are still people who believe that the earth is flat. That’s what happens to people who refuse to learn from the opposing ideologies, they become obsolete.
Therefore, it is very important to remain humble enough to accept that sometimes your method is not right and there is no shame in accepting that, it is a sign of a more developed and mature human being. Learn from the opposition too, because if we don’t then we would never be able to grow as humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e, proving that he was right all along. If the scientific community had shown a li...
^^
Line 4, column 430, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...n much ahead in many scientific fields. Similarly decades later when men reached moon and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 535, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...ace explorations later, there are still people who believe that the earth is flat. Tha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, still, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88541666667 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59326363412 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6826082339 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347045848665 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113102171566 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106789162637 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188914693154 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597444379996 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.