The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
While some people tend to think that the society will be benefit if people question authority, others seem to disagree with it. In my opinion, I believe that questioning authority or the government can truly enhance well-being of society.
To begin with, lots of knowledge is based on different questions to authority. To be specific, lots of science production and theories are from some people who questioned authority. For example, Steve Jobs, who was CEO of Apple, invented the new type of cellphone. Before Steve Jobs invented it, people used the old type of phone, and we could not imagine that every people can use Facetime to their family. When Steve Jobs invented this phone, lots of authority suspected him, and they think he would not be successful. However, Steve Jobs questioned them, and he really did the great job on inventing the new cellphone, IPHONE. Thus, it is a good example that if we challenge or question authority, we can enhance our society.
The second point is that questioning authority can develop the country. That is to say, if we question the government, we will have the well-being society. For instance, when the government wants to build the new bridge, they probably needs lots of money to build it. However, is the new bridge worth for people to spend lots of money to build? What if the government has the other reasons of building the bridge that people do not know? If people can question the government on different things, people can eliminate a lot of dispensable expenses. Thus, I think it is important for people to overlook the government if they want a well-being society.
True, some people might say that if people question authority all the time, they may postpone some important information which produced for people or they may break the criterion. However, this belief fools to consider the fact that if people do not question authority and let them use the power haphazardly, the society will be unfair, and they will not have a well-being society. Therefore, it is hard to convince people of this idea.
To sum up, with the reasons mentioned above, I think that if we question authority, our country or knowledge of different fields will benefit from it. There seems be to some validity to other point of view. However, I still believe that the reasons of my opinion are stronger.
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 50
- 14. The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine. "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount 69
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company. "Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivit 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal. "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimu 23
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
... to build the new bridge, they probably needs lots of money to build it. However, is ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, really, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9025 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60917132439 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3604544062 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1363636364 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393362511177 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119604299936 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810613424191 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250367999242 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102707738899 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.