When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Stating that when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of the historic building, this view asserts that moderns building are more useful than older buildings. In some senses, it is true that the latest building are more economical and efficient than old buildings. In my point, however, when it comes to tourism and studying history, historic buildings are not always obsolete and less valuable.
Of course, few would disagree that old buildings are better for replacing with up-to-date buildings. In modern societies, science has been developed. In this regard, earlier buildings are not proper for applying the developed technologies. For example in developing countries, because of restricted resource, they cannot choose both policies which one is the preservation of old buildings, another is substituting them with cutting-edge structures. This implies that the old buildings are ephemeral for developing a country's economy
Nonetheless, can we always say that old-style structures are always wasting? My answer is no. Regarding monetary value that out-dated buildings have in tourism, they could be more beneficial. For example, many tourists from other nations come to Rome to see heritages of the Roman empire. And they use a lot of money for eating, accommodation, and transport. If there are no these kind of buildings, there is no reason for the tourists to go to Rome. This implies that old-styled architecture could be economically helpful to a nation have them.
Moreover, considering the study about history, the reasons for being preserved are very ample. There are many limitations to studying our history with only written books or records. These previous ages' buildings show us the lifestyles of our ancestors and give us hints for studying them. The point is that old-styled structures are necessary for understanding previous people
To summarize, it is undeniable that developed buildings are more efficient and harmonized with contemporary lifestyles. when it comes to the profits from historic and scholarly value, however, the old style buildings are better than destroyed
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | vikey | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | chagens96 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | tanishqjain1002 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Charan H S | 50 | view |
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health CouncilAn innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East M 69
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 83
- Claim: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's major field of study. Reason: Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated. 66
- the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing. "During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not always obsolete and less valuable. Of course, few would disagree that old b...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. For example in developing countries, because of restricted resource, they can...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al for developing a countrys economy Nonetheless, can we always say that old-...
^^^
Line 6, column 373, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ommodation, and transport. If there are no these kind of buildings, there is no re...
^^
Line 6, column 376, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...odation, and transport. If there are no these kind of buildings, there is no reason for th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 382, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...n, and transport. If there are no these kind of buildings, there is no reason for th...
^^^^
Line 8, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essary for understanding previous people To summarize, it is undeniable that deve...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...rmonized with contemporary lifestyles. when it comes to the profits from historic a...
^^^^
Line 10, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tyle buildings are better than destroyed
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, kind of, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49855072464 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92478562129 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.1006163517 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8421052632 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483727905607 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123035830018 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174276169124 0.0758088955206 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257755896065 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210507859589 0.0667264976115 315% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.