When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Architecture is a form of art that exposes the popular designs and styles throughout time. When preserved, historic buildings can be glimpses into another era and even inspire elements of new modern building styles. Replacing old buildings on valuable land with new modern development could be useful for cleaning and safety purposes, but present a problematic practice that could destroy elements of national history.
Old buildings can be categorized in many different ways. For example, an old building could be a historical artifact such as the childhood home of a famous leader or a location where something important happened. On the other hand, an old building could simply be an abandoned home on the side of the road with little to no historical significance. In this case, modern planners would have less to consider when determining where to develop and the demolition of this building would have little to no consequence. Additionally, some old abandoned buildings can be high safety risks as it could be contaminated with decaying lead-based paint or the structural integrity of the building could be compromised with termites or rot and anyone who ventures to the upstairs would be in danger. This could be a justification for replacing an old building for modern purposes, but this would not necessarily stay true for historical buildings.
Historical buildings can be anything from the Empire State Building to Abraham Lincoln’s childhood home; both buildings were constructed in the past and now hold historical significance. If a developer were to demolish Lincoln’s childhood home, there would be massive unrest in the United States as many historical buildings are protected by state or federal law and citizens would see this as slander to one of the most beloved presidents. Historical buildings hold not just the memories of what occurred, but also the consequences of the events and the effects on the nation. The Declaration of Independence was signed in an “old building”, but any modification or alteration to this structure would be seen as a threat to the democratic values of the United States.
Lastly, the “modern purposes” that developers would intend to implement could be anything from a four-lane highway to an oil well. Each example would bring their own consequences to the area; any kind of development for energy, tourism, or transportation requires construction which would increase the pollution of air, water, and land. These “modern developments” could introduce more problems to an area that was once peacefully existing as a historical artifact.
Unless an old building can be proven to not have any kind of historical significance, it is best to leave it be. Developers could cause some people to protest their new projects if it is even assumed to affect an historical artifact. Even if an old building looks decrepit, it could have been the childhood home of a famous leader. Also, the problems of pollution that a modern development would introduce are too great to threaten historical areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | vikey | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | chagens96 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | tanishqjain1002 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Charan H S | 50 | view |
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 49
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes, which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated, are far more successful than are other methods at deterring che 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... Old buildings can be categorized in many different ways. For example, an old building coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...al significance, it is best to leave it be. Developers could cause some people to ...
^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'look'?
Suggestion: look
...rical artifact. Even if an old building looks decrepit, it could have been the childh...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...too great to threaten historical areas.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, look, so, well, for example, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2602.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28861788618 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14300665165 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479674796748 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 815.4 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.166225181 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.1 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31890874093 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118796222289 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640178467701 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204376972795 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634673272633 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.