"Whether in politics or in business, leaders of any group need to understand that learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning."
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your experience, observations, or reading.
The statement Whether in politics or in Business, leaders of any group need to understand that learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning is plausible to a certain extent. In business winning seems quite important since a successfull businessman thrives upon his ability to drive his firm or organisation in the right direction, which is also the case with politics, where a politicians ability to lead his party or workers to victory marks his ability to govern the party. A leader is the one who is in the driving seat for driving his party and organisation towards success. There are times when the hardest choices require strongest wills and learning to compromise sometimes for a cause which could benefit the organisation seems more important than winning.
Winning is a mentality not a method which encourages any organisation to thirve upon. Every individual must equally contribute for the same since it is the individuals in any group or organisation which ultimately add up to the organisation's success and win. However one should at the same time not forget that sometimes compromising is more important than winning. Throughout the history there have been various examples which alleviate this claim. During India's war for Independence against the British colonial power, India's freedom fighters had to sacrifice many things to give India Its independence. In order to give India Independence the Indian freedom fighters had to compromise with their treasurs worth millions which the british rulers had demanded as a compensation. This ultimately resulted in India getting its Independence.
Every individual has his own judgement which drives his decision for the same. We all should be more determined towards winning than compromising. However every situation demands for a different way of approach. Compromising for a cause which can later on lead to success seems more plausible than aggressively maintaining the position to win. Even in politics and Business people have to compromise sometimes as one can never be inevitable at winning. Having the patience to deliver is the key principle to winning.
In conclusion the statement that leaders of any group need to understand that learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning even in politics and business is true to a certain extent. Winning seems more important at times however, learning to compromise sometimes leads more important decisions than winning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | sanket_chaudhary | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the vice president of Gigantis a development company that builds and leases retail store facilities Nationwide over the past five years sales have increased significantly at outlet stores that deal exclusively i 60
- Whether in politics or in business leaders of any group need to understand that learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above Support your position with rea 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 75
- The following appeared in the opinion column of a financial magazine On average middle aged consumers devote 39 percent of their retail expenditure to department store products and services while for younger consumers the average is only 25 percent Since 55
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current sa 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'politicians'' or 'politician's'?
Suggestion: politicians'; politician's
...is also the case with politics, where a politicians ability to lead his party or workers to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 641, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'require the strongest'.
Suggestion: require the strongest
...here are times when the hardest choices require strongest wills and learning to compromise someti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 681, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'compromise'.
Suggestion: sometimes compromise
...require strongest wills and learning to compromise sometimes for a cause which could benefit the org...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisations'' or 'organisation's'?
Suggestion: organisations'; organisation's
...nisation which ultimately add up to the organisations success and win. However one should at ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ined towards winning than compromising. However every situation demands for a different...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'compromise'.
Suggestion: sometimes compromise
...in politics and Business people have to compromise sometimes as one can never be inevitable at winni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36153846154 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.950154611 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458974358974 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6300282964 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.052631579 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15789473684 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331953487862 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112321474868 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124681782339 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237392295716 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106393224232 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.