While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation.
The author claims that, in order to foster leadership of young people, it better to develop them with sense of cooperation instead of competition. In my view, both competition and cooperation benefit people to perform well in their leader positions.
On one hand, it is correct that leadership entails ability of cooperation. The main purpose of a good leader is to unit people together and achieve a sophisticated job that hard to be done by individual effort. A leader is unsuccessful if he or she cannot provide a congenial atmosphere in the workspace. Once the team members work separately or even work in the animosity, it cannot accomplish an even simple job and the leader of that team is unqualified. Therefore, having a sense of cooperation helps build a successful team.
On the other hand, competition is still an essential element for a vigorous team, hence is a necessity that a leader need to possess. It is necessary for a leader to keep in mind that proper competition can activate the power of change and innovation in a team. By the process of debating and challenge, it helps team members to understand their weakness and explore the new possibility, therefore, not only it will help solve problem that a group is tackling with but also instill vitality for the creativity. All these things are important for a successful team and the team leader.
Therefore, a sound and well-established organization of different areas including government, sports, or industry all incorporate competition and cooperation. In the sport team, coach will train players by matching them to vie with each other in the stadium; for running a government, the politician sometimes heckle another for a controversial law but sometimes cooperate to nudge a law to be passed. From back and froth between competition and cooperation, a group can reach their maximum efficiency and performance.
To sum up, the claim mentioned merely focus on one side and thus is deficient. A good team leader need to balance the team between competition and cooperation, these two elements are the essence of a sound and effective team.
- Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy the relative ease of finding a job and the salary they can expect to make Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or 62
- While some leaders in government sports industry and other areas attribute their success to a well developed sense of competition a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Sock Inc A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our socks are s 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...o foster leadership of young people, it better to develop them with sense of cooperati...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06267806268 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08010545568 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9601710448 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0625 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276199444325 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885552585266 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611193118382 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154855293666 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092026821526 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.