The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The graph below illustrates the proportion of population aged 65 and over for the period of 1940 -2040 in Japan, Sweden and USA.
It can be easily seen that the percentages of people aged 65 and over were closely changing in Sweden and USA, while the percentage in Japan had not reached 5 % during 1940-1996. After 1996, when the curves of Sweden and USA coincided, the difference between them became greater, to be more precise, the number of people aged 65 and over rose steadily and reached 20 %, whereas the percentage was stable in USA during that period.
Meanwhile, the quantity of indicated people began to rise in Japan since 2005, and it is considered that, the indicator of Japan will be maximum among three countries after 2030.
Finally, the major conclusion drawn from this chart is that, although there were fluctuations until 2030, it is anticipated that the proportions will not sharply differ during 2030-2040.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 70
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 68
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time You should write at least 250 words You shou 68
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 81
- the chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 90
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 156 200
No. of Characters: 747 1000
No. of Different Words: 93 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.534 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.788 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.504 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 50 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.615 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.552 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.925 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.241 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4