The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Given are the charts providing clear information about the causes of worldwide land degradation and the effects of this process on certain regions for the period of 1990s.
A glance at the pie-chart reveals that the main reason of the damage of the land was considered over grazing made by cattle which indicates approximately 35 % and was marginally ahead of deforestation with the indicator of 30 %. Meanwhile, about two fifth of the world area became less productive due to over cultivation, followed by other activities which is 7 %.
Referring to the table it can also be noted that the majo...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-03 | Dhani Aristya | 63 | view |
| 2014-01-03 | cut muftia keumala | 73 | view |
| 2014-01-02 | naflaawfiyah | 60 | view |
| 2013-12-01 | orduhan | 73 | view |
| 2013-12-01 | qazzass | 40 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002 90
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 76
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up. 40
- The first chart below shows the resuluts of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 83
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003, 2005 and 2007 83
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 203 200
No. of Characters: 997 1000
No. of Different Words: 118 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.775 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.911 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.941 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.329 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.452 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.78 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4