Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management effectiv

Essay topics:

Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others.

To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?

In companies it is one of the most important tasks of employers to motivate their workers in order to increase the effectiveness of them and the overall benefit of the company. For centuries many economist have attempted hard to find most influential method of motivating and paying extra money for distinctive contributions has usually been on the top list of such methods. But many people claim that, this motivating style is not perfect, because although it is stimuli for workers getting prize, it usually affects the others’ working desire negatively. I don’t completely agree with this opi...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 8.1 (19 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-14 Mattia95 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Dilbar :

Comments

Sentence: As we all know, competition usually trigger improvement and as a result of this fact, it can be said that money awards usually cause total rise in the general success rate of company.
Description: The fragment competition usually trigger is rare

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1495 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.792 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.592 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.623 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.359 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.671 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5