The graph shows the unemployment rates in the us and japan between march 1993 and march 1999.
Given is the graph that illustrates how unemployment rates changed in the US and Japan from March 1993 to March 1999. It can be clearly seen that, as the years went by, gap between two countries figures related to this issue closed steadily.
To begin with, on the premise of given time period, in terms of total number of jobless people the US was significantly ahead of Japan (7% vs. 2.5%). From that time on, the amount of unemployed people started to go down gradually and bottomed out in 1998 when the percentages of the unemployed reached to 5% of the whole work force of the country. On the contrary, in Japan joblessness figures went up considerably and hit its peak doubling in 1998 when it met with the figure for the USA.
When it comes to the final year, to be more precise, the year of 1999, both countries almost preserved their unemployment levels at around 5%.
To sum it up, although unemployment problem decreased in essence in the US, it experienced upward trend in Japan.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 53
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 75
- The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 61
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 177 200
No. of Characters: 788 1000
No. of Different Words: 111 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.647 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.452 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.61 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 35 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 21 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.229 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.428 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.749 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4