The graph shows the unemployment rates in the us and japan between march 1993 and march 1999.
Given is the graph that illustrates how unemployment rates changed in the US and Japan from March 1993 to March 1999. It can be clearly seen that, as the years went by, gap between two countries figures related to this issue closed steadily.
To begin with, on the premise of given time period, in terms of total number of jobless people the US was significantly ahead of Japan (7% vs. 2.5%). From that time on, the amount of unemployed people started to go down gradually and bottomed out in 1998 when the percentages of the unemployed reached to 5% of the whole work force of the country. On the contrary, in Japan joblessness figures went up considerably and hit its peak doubling in 1998 when it met with the figure for the USA.
When it comes to the final year, to be more precise, the year of 1999, both countries almost preserved their unemployment levels at around 5%.
To sum it up, although unemployment problem decreased in essence in the US, it experienced upward trend in Japan.
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 74
- In some countries it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants for their age Is it positive or negative to the development 73
- Too much attention is paid to and too much money is spent on keeping pets, while people throughout the world are starving.•Discuss the arguments for and against keeping pets•To what extent do you agree? 68
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 53
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 68
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 177 200
No. of Characters: 788 1000
No. of Different Words: 111 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.647 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.452 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.61 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 35 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 21 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.229 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.428 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.749 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4