Some employers reward members of staff for their expectional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.To what extent is this style effective.Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Nowadays the employees who excel from others with their personal abilities and success in their work are motivated by chiefs and awarded by giving extra money or other incentive payments. Some people are of the opinion that it can strongly motivate them while others completely ignore this statement and point out that it can have a negative effect on others. Personally, I believe that this style of management cannot impact so negatively as some people consider, but before drawing a quick conclusion this statement needs to be discussed.
First of all, we can acknowledge that as everyone else,...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-08-07 | moman_1031 | 50 | view |
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 68
- The tables below show the students per lecturer and the number of students in various practice and lecture based subjects Summarise the information in the following three tables and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problems 83
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 70
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 90
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1443 1500
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.7 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.621 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.462 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.374 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.194 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5