The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Over these years we have faced many invitations so people should have enough money and information about new modern technology to have the chance of using these facilities. The below graph illustrate how the percentage of domestic access to some modern technologies has changed during 1996/97 up to 2002/02 in UK.

Using of CD players from 60% in 1996 has steadily increased to 81% in 2002. We have same pattern for PC from 28% in 96/97 to about 58% in 2001. In addition, the usage of mobile phone is fluctuated but the trend is up. It has reached from less than 20% in 96 to more than 60% in 2002.The internet was invented in 98 and the accessing of it dramatically increased meanwhile and reached to more than 40% in 2002.

To sum up, All of these modern technologies have upward figures and it shows that they have become more common to use in 2002/2003 in compare of 1996/1997.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-27 oxfordpro125 78 view
2019-04-21 Mike_Moody 100 view
2014-03-11 adventurer 70 view
Essays by user adventurer :

Comments

The below graph illustrate
The below graph illustrates

in compare of 1996/1997.
in comparison of 1996/1997.

flaws:
For task I, you don't need to develop something new:
Over these years we have faced many invitations so people should have enough money and information about new modern technology to have the chance of using these facilities.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 165 200
No. of Characters: 699 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.584 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.236 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.479 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 39 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 26 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 19 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.157 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.423 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.062 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4