The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graphs elucidate how many visitors visited three London Museums, namely; British, science and natural history during June to September 2013.

As it can be seen from the graph, British museum received the most visitors. Initially, the museum had 600,000 visitors and it peaked at around 720,000 visitors in July. From July to August, British museum experienced some downturns where it received 600,000 visitors to 500,000 visitors, respectively. After August, the number of visitors visiting British museum rose to reach at nearly 650,000 people.

Meanwhile, the least popular among the British people were science museum as it started at 400,000 visitors. Then the number of visitors visiting science museum continued to decline for the first three months. Science museum received the lowest visitors in August of 300,000 visitors. From August, the trend for the visiting science museum is similar for those of British museum as it rose to approximately similar of those visiting Natural history museum (450,000).

Natural history museum had about 550,000 visitors in June and the preference of British people to visit Natural history museum continued to decline to finish at 450,000 visitors.

It is apparent that, the most famous museum in London is British museum as it always received more than 500,000 visitors within the projected period.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-31 xenocide 73 view
Essays by user YS89 :

Comments

during June to September 2013.
during June to September in 2013.

flaws:
More content wanted for Natural history museum.

---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 211 200
No. of Characters: 1115 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.811 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.284 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.338 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.182 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.67 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.091 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.522 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.734 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.203 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4