14.2.2019 and 20.8.2022: The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
The table illustrates the amount of plant and animal based products consumed by a person in a certain European country between 1992 and 2012.
Overall, vegetation products showed a clearly increasing trend while meat and dairy products had been eaten less or with a negligible change.
In 1992, an average person consumed about 2100 grams of vegetables on a weekly basis, the highest amount on the table. Cereals (wheat) and fruits (beans) were much less consumed, at around 800 grams and 500 grams per person respectively. During the period of 20 years, people in the country had eaten with a consistent increase in all kinds of the plant-based produce. The figure for vegetables in 2012 was over 2200 grams intake per head, followed by nearly 1000 grams of cereal and 600 grams of fruits.
Though meat was the second most consumed with over 1100 grams per person a week in 1992, it became less eaten over the 20-year period.Ending up with slightly less than the beginning intake by 2012. Only cheese saw a sustainable intake approximately 125 grams given the time being
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 SAMPLE DOL 78
- the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles
- 4 11 2017 It is difficult for people inm the cities to get enough physical exercises What are the reasons What are the solutions 89
- 18 6 2016 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- 14 2 2019 and 20 8 2022 The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Ending
...came less eaten over the 20-year period.Ending up with slightly less than the beginnin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8956043956 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51041184123 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6612030912 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178704936534 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825289603592 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727703713643 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118991836748 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826951133995 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.