19. The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph displayed gives information about the various types of criminal offences that had occurred in Panama City between 2010 and 2019. These areas of crime were Burglary, car theft and robbery.
It is noticeable that the number of burglary in the city was close to 3500 in 2010, following that of car theft (2800) and that of robbery (700). In the next five years, the number of cases for burglary dropped dramatically after a slight rise, down to only 1000 and ranked after the number of car theft. 2010 to 2015 saw decreases in the incidents of car theft and robbery, with 500 and 200 cases less respectively.
Between 2015 and 2019, the number of cases for all three types of crime had increased mildly. The incidents of car theft reached about 2800 cases in 2019 and had become the most common type of criminal offence during the period of time. The figures of incidents of burglary and robbery had kept relatively stable in the five-year time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following the statement?Being creative rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution a problem 70
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- TPO 42 81
- 15 The key to solving environmental problem is simple present generation are willing to accept a less comfortable life for the sake of the future generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...mon type of criminal offence during the period of time. The figures of incidents of burglary a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30416966763 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6306813079 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0986284912577 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513825585744 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448543039466 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839429086658 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549093718713 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.