alterations and differences in average house prices in five major cities over the period from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989.
The chart illustrates the alterations and differences in average house prices in five major cities over the period from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989.
From 1990 to 1995, average house price¬s in NY, Tokyo, and London significant fall over the time 1990-1995. Particularly, house buyers in Tokyo and London had to pay less 7% than in 1989, and in NY, this dropped change was by 5%. By contrast, in this time frame, Madrid and Frankfurt experienced a slight increase, by about 2% increase from 1989 prices.
In period 1996-2002, most of the major cities witnessed notable growth in house prices. In particular, London accounted for the most change in house prices compared to 1989, by over 12% changes, following that were New York and Madrid, by just over 5% and 4% respectively. Meanwhile, only Tokyo remained a decrease by 5% compared to 1989 prices.
In conclusion, over the period 12 years from 1990 to 2002, the tendency of average house prices in New York and London fluctuated with the most significant change in London house prices. By contrast, the changing tendency in Madrid, Tokyo, and Frankfurt was unchangeable with the fallen in Tokyo and the risen in both Madrid and Frankfurt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-08 | Spring2019 | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Spring2019 | 67 | view |
- The figure illustrates the process of collecting information and producing trustful weather forecasts at Australian Bureau of Meteorology. 89
- the table below gives information about underground railway systems in 6 cities 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the table gives information about underground railway systems in 6 cities 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...decrease by 5% compared to 1989 prices. In conclusion, over the period 12 years ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9504950495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66104650709 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475247524752 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7447568103 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522220438734 0.215688989381 242% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241251109314 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.249782269567 0.0843802449381 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.412077775613 0.15604864568 264% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.280903767032 0.0819641961636 343% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.