Many employers think that social skills are as important as good qualifications employing people. To what extent do you agree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in the job?
Nowadays, social skills have become a significant requirement for employers to consider in recruitment. Therefore, I strongly agree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in the job.
First, good social skills are an advantage which facilitates employees ‘s job such as shortening time to complete works, facilitating processes, achieving superior results. In the office environment, good relationship with colleges makes a substantial contribution to successful works due to effortless to receive assistants when needed. For examples, co-workers may give more straightforward supports to people they like than those they barely know. Predecessors with whom new hires have good relation also willing to share their own valuable experiences and great instructions. For that reason, those new hires have better chances to learn processes of new job and shorten time for adaptation.
Second, many people argue that high qualified employees still greatly perform their job without good social skills such as particular engineers, scientists, adventurers, astronomers. However, those jobs only take a small percentage of workers in employing market with some special subjects. The remains of laboring market still prefer individuals which have high social skills as they bring better contributions to companies. For example, employees who have the wide range connections can increases the chance to find new customers and maintain old ones, thus good for business. Furthermore, they easy to approach the related events and news that profoundly impact on business such as new coming policies, activities of competitors, volatile of market, along with, considerable contributing on success of corporations.
In conclusion, social skills have as important role for in employment requirements as qualifications and should be taken into serious consideration of employers when conducting recruitment. Because not only do great social skills have substantial advances in internal activities in office, but those skills also take notably outside benefits to companies as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-19 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 72
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 78
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments' expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84789644013 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14478526858 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618122977346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2945444622 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383529657522 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144680980591 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143516821422 0.0667982634062 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294502553701 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152057497347 0.056905535591 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.