The chart illustrates percentage changes of prices, in five main cities, from 1989. There are two parts of average prices: between 1990-1995 and between 1996-2002 years.
In details, the first part of chart show that in New York, London and Tokyo prices declined by 5% and more. But after 1995 year they increased prices exept London. For New York and Tokyo prices doubled and increased by 10%. Then it was around 5% instead of -5% compared with the average price in 1989.
Unfortunately, we can see the prices of Tokyo increased by only approximately 2,5% and was -5%.
However, the capital of Spain has stable rise in average house price in all 12 years. In the first part price pose by 2% and in the second part has also a rise by 4% compared with a 1989 year.
In addition prices in Frankfurt climed in both two years, but if we corpure prices between the first and the second parts, we can see that there was a fall by 1%.
The price of houses in London increased wildly. In years between 1990 and 1995 the average prices were less than in 1989 by 7,5% but after 1995 was gradually rise by 18,5% and stabilized at 11% compared with the 1989.
It is noticeable that in all cities were rises in average prices in 12 years. When compared to prices of 1989 and 1990-1995 years, we can see that in three cities had drop in prices and in 1996-2002 cities increased their prices exept Tokyo. London was the city that had the largest variation in house prices among all five cities.
- The bar chart below shows the production of the world’s oil in OPEC and non-OPEC countries.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before.What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest? 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased prices exept London. For New York and Tokyo prices doubled and increased b...
^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...se by 4% compared with a 1989 year. In addition prices in Frankfurt climed in both two...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In addition prices in Frankfurt climed in both two years, but if we corpure pri...
^^
Line 6, column 158, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...89 by 7,5% but after 1995 was gradually rise by 18,5% and stabilized at 11% compared...
^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in house prices among all five cities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51111111111 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23693892353 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455555555556 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4696321484 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4087329736 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170152889478 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104159518516 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218206755311 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105553927187 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.