Zoo have become increasingly popular from the end of 20th century. However, the issue of keeping animals in captivity have remained controversial, with solid arguments on both sides.
On the one hand, some people believe that keeping animals out of their natural habitat is wrong, because wildlife will not flourish in restricted territory. Take for example the great white shark that requires specific conditions like real pray to feed on or enormous space to wander, without which it dies in captivity. Furthermore, in so-called “Animal Park” creatures are constantly displayed to visitors, which leads to a great stress of animals, followed by probable lethargic behavior. Lastly, it is obvious that zoos take care of the animals most of the time, which means they are being fed and heal if some accident occur. As a result, there is no need in particular features of animals, because hunting and searching for food is no longer there everyday need, causing a possible genetic degradation of future generations, that will eventually erase the species themselves.
On the other hand, people claim that some animals should be kept in captivity, especially the endangered ones. The reason for this is to stabilize population of particular species and return them back to natural habitat. Moreover, besides poaching climate change the spread of possible disease might be stopped if some pieces are treated to have inner resistance for the plague and just read their genes. Finally, creatures in the zoos allow complex scientific researches to take place, after which Humanity may excel in various field, predominantly medicine and ecology. Such achievements will support people to prevail and significant amount of problems.
Overalls, although keeping animals out of their natural habitat posseses some threats, the future results and gained experience will allow to compensate all of the drawbacks, not only for humans, but for animals as well.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2016, and future projections for 2025. 86
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 84
- The line chart shows average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in the US from 2000 to 2011 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'compensating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: compensating
...esults and gained experience will allow to compensate all of the drawbacks, not only for huma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ned experience will allow to compensate all of the drawbacks, not only for humans, but for...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73695521499 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6908485841 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202617913751 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704637594456 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615941793 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119123208852 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382915305141 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.