The passage and the lecture discussed the origin of the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet painted by famous Dutch artist Rembrandt. While the information in the passage is full of doubts that the portrait belongs to Rembrandt, the lecture proves that Rembrandt could draw this masterpiece.
First, some doubts regarding inconsistencies in clothing can be explained as pigments influence on the portrait. The painting was covered by pigments in order to make the woman more sophisticated. Moreover, it was revealed that the fur collar coat was added a hundred years after the portrait was.
Second, the theory that the shadows and lights are wrongly shown on the portrait are also unreasonable because they are very realistic originally. The way how Rembrandt used to draw shadows on the fur collar and the woman's face is the authentic which Rembrandt could use only.
Third, the back of the painting was a single piece of wood and it was also used in master's self-portrait, where behind the Rembrandt's back was the same solid blosk of wood as it was in the portrait of woman.
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- The diagram below shows how salt is removed from sea water to make it drinkable. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel into work every day. The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment. What measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long 90
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries the high rates of crimes are committed by teenagers why this has happened the effects of the happenings 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 185.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9027027027 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73009898493 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9921866521 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0951485787698 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458559373382 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519470939056 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639075726717 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554584917546 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.