The graph provides information about change of standard earnings in different fields of employment in the United States over the period from 1970 to 2010.
There are two basic general trends, downward and upward. Regarding the former, the salary in Professional Sports fluctuated slightly, however, they were still down over those four decades. The earnings reached its peak in 2000, going up by $20,000 and climbing to $145,000. After that, it bottomed, experiencing a dramatic fall and decreasing from the previous number to $110,000.
Oppositely, average earnings in the other spheres climbed. Concerning the salary in the sphere of IT, it surged drastically, rising from only $35,000 to $100,000, going from the lowest volume among the three areas to one of the highest. Furthermore, the payment to workers in Engineering rose slightly during the whole period, increasing from $55,000 to $70,000
Overall, although average salary in Professional Sports stayed the highest, it is clear that people in the other spheres were getting more money with years.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Would you before to go to a small university in the countryside or a large university in the city 91
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 69
- It Is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, regarding, still, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31927710843 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61690657629 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668674698795 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0665439992 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139644739317 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599911394663 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616022463026 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961616418697 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582752038184 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.