Once in the past century the flights of Gagarin an Armstrong baptized the world into the age of the man in space. Since those significant events in the history of mankind, a large amount of attention and money has been granted to space research by governments and societies. Although the funding of space investigations brings many benefits, the government should pay attention to other necessary matters because of some important reasons.
For the first reason, development in space research are seals Limited by using satellites, which people serve to provide the internet, mobile or weather forecasting. Who won, they forget to take the widespread poverty and severe drought, for example, in the large part of the Earth, especially in Africa. In addition, there are still people in the world who cannot afford usuals Health Service themselves. Providing money support in a proper way to help such poor countries or categories of people there will be saved a plethora of lives, and, as a result, people will be given an opportunity to improve their households and education.
Another reason is that the aim of space explorations in many cases are targeted on military goals. Although the governments of high-income countries try to solve situation with starvation and poverty, their efforts are a little drops in comparison with the huge interests and funding of space examinations. Noticeably, two big leaders in the world, which have spent tremendous money for a space, are Russia and USA, and in both of them the healthcare systems are not in the top list worldwide.
To sum up, I believe that is the money as the money as opportunities given to the rich countries should be allocated wisely to find decisions on the worldwide problems. It is an ambiguous issue but mankind should sustain decisions for top-priority programs, associated closely with enhancement of lives on the Earth what out of the planet.
- TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV 76
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Once in the past century the flights of Gaga...
^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...in Africa. In addition, there are still people in the world who cannot afford usuals H...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ice themselves. Providing money support in a proper way to help such poor countries or categori...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, for example, in addition, as a result, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10158730159 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84562050517 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6734907771 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188159252163 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609886218802 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378547417493 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108064063173 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347793814027 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.