With all the troubles in the world today, money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other things.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the year is ongoing the things are changing in every field of branches in an alarming rate as well as the discovery of the space. This always poses the debates among the people and it is considered that spending money on space discoveries is not beneficial at all. The money would rather be devoted to other things. I agree to this statement with several reasons.
First and foremost, huge amount of money is being spent on space discoveries and even some of them would cost couples of million dollars. Furthermore, while dealing with some experiments, they plainly fail and even explode. It means wasting too much money without taking into account the details whether the forthcoming experiment feasible or not. Instead, government should spend money on creditable actions like: education, sport and so on.
In addition, the more experiments are being tested the more contamination of environment is increasing. The pollution of air is jeopardizing our life chronically, besides, huge amount of greenhouse gas emissions by spacecrafts continuing to be unsolved problem. Statistics show that, every time rockets took off they keep destructing the ozone layer and it causes the ozone holes. Consequently, the temperature is rising as the year passes and it may bring the world to the repercussions for instance: growing sea levels and drought in some countries.
To conclude, from my perspective the government should pay attention to those actions. From my point of view, it would be better caring about the people's situation than vanishing so much money on trivial actions.
- The charts below show the proportions of the world's oil resources held in different areas, together with the proportions consumed anually in the same areas.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where 80
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt within in the three countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990sSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 70
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The diagram below shows the process of using water to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ew, it would be better caring about the peoples situation than vanishing so much money ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, even so, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19921875 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85253354614 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6484375 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9484313975 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0714285714 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209101836078 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656400410387 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620833826314 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112740789619 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630233773584 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.