The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
The pie charts below gives information about the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010, and is comparison by major categories. The most significant facts to emerge from charts were that, the household expenditure both Japan and Malaysia had different of presentation so drastic. The biggest percentage in Japan was the goods and service and in Malaysia was housing.
In Japan, the biggest percentage was 29% notably for the other goods and service, it was followed by food at 24% which this component stood in on the second list, then the third followed by housing at 21%, moreover there is transport was 20%, and the final percentage was health care only at 6%.
On the other hand, comparison with Malaysia, the housing of category got the biggest percentage up to 34%, then it was followed by food which getting the second list was 27%, and the third that is the other goods and service of category at 26%, then transport stood at 10%, and the smallest item was health care just at 3%. All of category on the household expenditure was measured by percentages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 61
- The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 61
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d different of presentation so drastic. The biggest percentage in Japan was the goo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, so, then, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86559139785 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63877737379 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.4015041376 43.030603864 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254942938541 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189665295384 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161291390249 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204309869032 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.211823684887 0.0819641961636 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.