Average percentage of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar.
The three pie chart illustrates the quantity of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar included in four standard American meals percentagewise.
Overall, Americans consumed the highest amount of sodium and fat at dinner, while sugar intake was recorded maximum during snacks. Another interesting fact reveled that breakfast contained the least amount of all three nutrients.
When considering the consumption of sodium, the breakfast and lunch equals the amount of sodium intake in dinner. Likewise, the quantity of saturated fats in snack and breakfast carries same weight as at dinner. Same as above, intake of sugar in dinner and lunch matches the potion of sugar during snacks.
Regarding the absorption of sugar during the day, the percentage rose by 3% between breakfast and lunch, and then 4% from lunch to dinner. As opposed to other nutrients, the citizens take an equal amount of 14% sodium for snacks and breakfast. On a final note, the saturated fat jumped 10% from breakfast and lunch, and then additional 11% increase from lunch to dinner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-16 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 in some land 87
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What can be the reason for this What would you suggest as a solution 61
- The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 67
- Question Modern technology has a great impact on our environment Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution Discuss both views and give your own opinio 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2899408284 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62815165489 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.9341498782 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290067360797 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127254498242 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727755040478 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199812145259 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562468829088 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.