The line graph shows the average prices of tickets sold at a theatre and the bar
chart shows the average percentage of tickets sold in 2010 and 2011. Summarise the
information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
where relevant
The provided line graph and bar chart illustrate the changes in the average ticket prices and the percentage of tickets sold at a theater in the four different quarters of 2010 and 2011.
Overall, ticket prices increased significantly from the second quarter of 2010 and maintained this higher level until the middle of 2011. Additionally, the percentage of tickets sold peaked in the fourth quarter of 2010, coinciding with the period of highest ticket prices.
Examining the line graph in more detail, ticket prices remained steady at £9.25 in the first half of 2010. There was a notable increase from £9.25 to £10.5, which remained stable until the second quarter of 2011. After a slight fluctuation, prices again reached £10.5 at the end of 2011.
Turning to the bar chart, it is evident that the percentage of tickets sold was stable at 60% in Q1 and Q2 of 2010, while ticket prices were constant. After declining by 10% in Q3, the percentage of tickets sold peaked at 80% in Q4, during the price hike. This was the highest percentage of tickets sold among the eight quarters. In the first quarter of 2011, there was a dramatic drop, with a 60% decrease from Q4 of 2010. Subsequently, the number of tickets sold increased gradually, reaching 65% in the last quarter of 2011, despite fluctuations in ticket prices during this period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-16 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | TranMinhDuc | 71 | view |
- The best way to learn about other cultures is to work in multinational organizations Do you agree or disagree 61
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little 66
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 50
- The graph below shows the number of people taking part in a wildlife survey in Britain between 2001 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90829694323 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54535337842 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471615720524 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3804672587 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.181818182 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382066581226 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17635199697 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110871867018 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28154211666 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10961962644 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.