It is a good thing if senior management workers in a company get a much higher salary than other workers in the same company. Do you agree or disagree?
The salary of any employee is commensurate with the level of experience, workload, skills and stress. The size of salary of the top officials in an organisation is disproportionately higher than the ordinary staff, sparking much debate in now a days. Although there are some drawbacks in this discrepancy, i am not favor of this imbalance.
One compelling argument in favor on my position is the top officials of any industry has to take much stress than the other worker. All responsibilities are on him which is the most arduous task. If one employee do some fault, he can be fired although he don't know about this. So it is obvious that the top employee's salary will be much higher than the ordinary worker.
Secondly, the top staff have to obligation to fulfill the company goal, make the officials more burden and stressed. Moreover, The general staff feel very motivated to reach this stage and get more money, lead the staff to focus on their duty and more efficient.
However, if the discrepancy is more than the limit, then there will more likely create anarchy. This can lead all general staff unhappy. If CEO is overpaid and workers are underpaid then there are more likely the firm would suffer a lot.
To sum up, I reiterate my opinion by saying that the size of pay should be higher for top official than the ordinary workers because of workload, stress, and a lot of responsibilities. But the firm must care about whether this discrepancy is fair, not overpaying the top official.
- The graph below shows the number of people taking part in a wildlife survey in Britain between 2001 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years 50
- The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have a longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...ordinary staff, sparking much debate in now a days. Although there are some drawbacks in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a (days)' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a (days); days
...nary staff, sparking much debate in now a days. Although there are some drawbacks in t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: i is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...are some drawbacks in this discrepancy, i am not favor of this imbalance. One co...
^
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'favored'.
Suggestion: favored
...drawbacks in this discrepancy, i am not favor of this imbalance. One compelling argu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...out this. So it is obvious that the top employees salary will be much higher than the ord...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...he firm would suffer a lot. To sum up, I reiterate my opinion by saying that the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, as to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78748258678 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546153846154 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6525180151 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5714285714 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177693922067 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600146691071 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651849515509 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927456445898 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498077089492 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.