bar
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of British nationals spending on charity by age range and it compares the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that people aged between 36 and 65 spent the highest amount of money on charity work in both the years and the least amount of money endorsed by young people in 2010.
In 1990, young adults spent more than 15% of their income on charity and the proportion of expenditure on nonprofit works gradually increased to more than 40 % in the age range of 36-50 years. However, after the age of 50 people tends to lower their share and it went down under 35% for the people aged over 65 years old.
On the other hand, in 2010, the overall trend is the same as in 1990 except that people tend to reduce their share after the age of 65. It is evident from the chart that the proportion reduced from approximately 40% to 35% between the age range of 51-65 and more than 65 years old.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 66
- In our time specialists of all kinds are highly overrated We need more generalists people who can provide broad perspectives 50
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before it means putting old ideas together in new ways 50
- A unique curriculum for students 62
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be s 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37356321839 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17905427904 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.8564412779 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0417447818648 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322672078131 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721516701142 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0484008117196 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083832665026 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.66 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.