Bar Chart 1: Number of Marriage and Divorces in the USA 1970-2000
Bar Chart 2: Marital status of adult Americans, 1970 and 2000
The first bar chart illustrates the number of marriages and divorces in the USA between 1970 and 2000. And the second chart shows the proportion of the marital status of adult Americans over the same period as mentioned.
Overall, the trend of marriages declined and the divorce rate witnessed a mild fluctuation throughout the term in the first chart. However, in the second chart, married people surpassed the other statuses even though there was a drop in the percentage of wedded folks in the subsequent years.
As regards the first chart, while marriages went unaltered at 2.5 million from 1970 to 1980, the similar interval witnessed a gradual climb from 1 to 1.4 million for divorces. But in the following years, there was a steady drop in the marriages from 2.5 million to finish the span at 2 million. Divorces likewise experienced a similar direction, falling evenly from 1.4 million to 1 million in the final year.
Regarding the final chart, beginning at 70% in 1970, married people fell to just under 60% in 2000, which was still the highest figure, compared to the others. Next, never married ballooned to 20% in 2000, being slightly higher than the original amount at around 16% in 1970. On the other hand, widowed and divorced existed just under 10%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-12-05 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 79 | view |
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 85
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 70
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 216 200
No. of Characters: 1019 1000
No. of Different Words: 119 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.834 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.718 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.438 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.352 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.9 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.411 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.691 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed and divorced existed just under 10%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, likewise, regarding, second, still, while, as regards, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90740740741 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46386783712 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1165550793 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364490966657 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14838838603 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14388838351 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24618675765 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17662477963 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.