The bar chart and a line graph show the proportion of governmental expenses on the Arts and the comparison of the numbers of participants of the events in 1995 and 2005.
The bar and lineal charts illustrate the proportion of governmental expenditures on the Arts and the comparison of the numbers of participants of the events in 1995 and 2005.
Looking from an overall perspective, the biggest sums were spent on literature regardless the year, whereas on the second spot there were visual arts in 1995 and theatre in 2005. It is also apparent that the musical events attracted the majority of people both in 1995 and 2005, whereas theater was the least popular.
As for details, the major expenditures were focused on literature and the third part of all budget in 1995 was spent on visual arts and music each in nearly same proportion, but in 2005 the leading positions were held by music and theater.
The number of people participating in the Arts events differed depending on the form of arts and in general there was an upward trend with the only exception in the numbers of the participants interested in visual arts. The outlier both in 1995 and 2005 was music with over then 100 000 and 150 000, respectively. The next nearest event was theater with a slight increase in 2005, followed by visual arts fluctuated around 50 000. In the final position was literature under 30 000 by 2005.
- Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership Do you agree 89
- The author of the article suggests that this type of dinosaur was the inactive hunter and preferred to eat dead animals and eggs However the lecture argued that R robustus was an active hunter and could be hunted on other dinosaurs 61
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 78
- The garph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparisons where relevant 84
- Your local government has decided to improve their community Do you think they should A build a public park B build a public library C build a public pool 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...then 100 000 and 150 000, respectively. The next nearest event was theater with a s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, then, third, whereas, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.779342723 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65089064851 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511737089202 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1236558984 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315817710809 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166155126063 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175765665042 0.0843802449381 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254838062341 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.212230255925 0.0819641961636 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.