The Internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. Do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that a plethora of information accessible online has prompted some to question the value of international travel. Going on a journey to other countries is a rewarding experience, but it is apparently inferior to a virtual one.
Indeed, the Internet has brought us tons of information from different places on our planet. Articles, online magazines, podcasts enhance knowledge of the world around us and affect our perception of the various countries’ environments. With the help of the mentioned sources, a person can get closer to a new culture and explore more about foreign peoples. What is also wonderful is that the Internet offers us YouTube and IGTV where a curious listener can find absolutely any videos when he is craving to know more about a new landmark. It is easy to learn something new just by navigating the Internet and diving inside the world of amazing events and findings
By the same token, the variety of social media convinces me of the ease of getting closer to other cultures as well as ethnicities. The opportunities for such apps as Skype, Zoom, and Facebook cannot be overestimated. Their users can communicate from absolutely any spot in the world. It is amazing how with the help of these applications we can learn how other peoples live. When it is time to make foreign friends, websites such as Facebook and Twitter can connect people and facilitate friendships and acquaintances. Despite this great option of making connections, the internet additionally gives the opportunity to take part in public discussions online in various interest clubs. For the past several months during the pandemic, users utilized such social media in order to understand how other people live too.
Nonetheless, most travelers can justify the time and money by the enjoyable experience and discovery of another country. These experiences are also formative. For example, someone who grows up in a wealthy European nation might not have seen how people live in developing or more ethnically diverse countries. They will therefore have a fuller understanding of the rest of the world if they travel a lot and this could impact both their political views and their actions later in life.
To sum up, the information that can be found on the internet has greatly diminished the importance of the experience of traveling to other countries. Each individual must nonetheless decide for themselves whether it is still a worthwhile expense.
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 84
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 76
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great britain between 1961 and 2001 Write a report summarizing the information Select and describe the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts show how university students spent their money in three countries in 2003 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying habits in Australian cities
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... apparently inferior to a virtual one. Indeed, the Internet has brought us tons...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Internet and diving inside the world of amazing events and findings By the same...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to sum up, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12871287129 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92528183201 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4334641156 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.052631579 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193297370493 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533589078617 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508053307057 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969711572545 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360422111414 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.