The graph shows data about the number of British people who donate money to charities according to ages in the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall the percentage of donators people before and after the age of 50 share different patterns. donations from the three younger groups of people declined remarkably in 2010 compared to 1990, while that of people aged over 50 witnessed an opposite trend.
In 1990 the age group of 36-50 donated money more than other people at 42%, while the 18-25s contributed the least, at only 17%. However, by 2010, these figures had declined significantly to 35% and 5% respectively.
While donations up to the age of 50 declined across the two years, they rose among the 51-65 age-group from 35% to nearly 40%, which was the highest figure in 2010. Also, 26-35 aged people declined by around 7% in donations between the years. The figure for people who were over 65s in 2010 was lower than this, but it was still a little higher than the 1990 figure, at 32%.
- the graph and table below show the average monthly temperature and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities.summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph shows the number of fatal injuries resulting in death of workers in New Zealand between 1992 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 94
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the adva 67
- The bar chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 84
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Donations
...the age of 50 share different patterns. donations from the three younger groups of people...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68390804598 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30963705062 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9037518549 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192569828217 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988198852614 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594418561829 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145390903979 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585944690675 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.