The given bar chart indicates the investment contribution in terms of four different sectors in five organizations (A, B, C, D, and E).
Overall, the building field is invested the most money of all five organizations. Notably, organization B spends more money on its investment, while organizations D and E register the lowest figures shown on the chart.
Looking at the chart in greater detail, organization B spends the most money on staff training with € 1.9 billion, compared to about € 0.7 and €0.9 billion for those in organizations D, and E respectively. By contrast, companies D and E invest the most in building, at nearly € 1 billion each, which is € 0.4 billion lower than organization B. Machinery is allocated the lowest amount of money by organization B (€ 0.9 billion), whereas those in organizations D and E spend the least on research.
Turning to the others, around € 1.7 billion is invested in the building of organization A, in comparison with about € 1 billion in organization C. On the other hand, organization C invests the highest amount of its budget in machinery and research with almost € 1.3 billion each, while organization A spends the lowest money on these categories, at € 1 and € 1.1 billion respectively.
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 84
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The charts give information about world forests in five different regions 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€1'.
Suggestion: €1
...s the most money on staff training with € 1.9 billion, compared to about € 0.7 and ...
^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€0'.
Suggestion: €0
...g with € 1.9 billion, compared to about € 0.7 and €0.9 billion for those in organiz...
^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€1'.
Suggestion: €1
... invest the most in building, at nearly € 1 billion each, which is € 0.4 billion lo...
^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€0'.
Suggestion: €0
...g, at nearly € 1 billion each, which is € 0.4 billion lower than organization B. Ma...
^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€0'.
Suggestion: €0
...owest amount of money by organization B € 0.9 billion, whereas those in organizatio...
^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€1'.
Suggestion: €1
...esearch. Turning to the others, around € 1.7 billion is invested in the building o...
^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€1'.
Suggestion: €1
...rganization A, in comparison with about € 1 billion in organization C. On the other...
^^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€1'.
Suggestion: €1
...t in machinery and research with almost € 1.3 billion each, while organization A sp...
^^^
Line 4, column 350, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€1'.
Suggestion: €1
...he lowest money on these categories, at € 1 and € 1.1 billion respectively.
^^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '€1'.
Suggestion: €1
...t money on these categories, at € 1 and € 1.1 billion respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93896713615 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1877968844 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6702193588 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3195071844 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171660253737 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441619641912 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230580989904 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266105825834 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.