The bar chart below shows the average life expectancy in a number of regions, compared to the global average.
Write a report summarizing the main features, making comparisons where relevant.
The information about life expectancy average in each regions compared to average life expectancy of global is given in the bar chart. The data is measured in years. Over all, it can be clearly seen that Europe had the highest life expectancy average.
To begin with, there were two continents that had a higher life expectancy average which was 68 and 64 for women and men respectively. Firstly, Europe's figure was the highest. At 81, female lives 4 years linger than male. Similarly, in North America, levels of life expectancy for women was higher than men, at 73 and 70.
On the other hand, three regions had a lower life expectancy average than global average. To start with, the average life expectancy of women was 5 years longer than men in both Asia and South America, at 62 and 60 respectively. In contrast, female life expectancy levels in Africa was lower than male, at 53 and 56. In addition, Africa's people lives shortest compared to other continents in this chart including world average.
- The graph below shows average house prices in four Massachusetts towns from 1988 to 2002 (in US dollars.)Summarize the information selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of children who participated in different activities in their leisure time in the UK in 2014. 67
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows average house prices in four Massachusetts towns from 1988 to 2002 (in US dollars.)Summarize the information selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- In spite of the advance made in agriculture, many people in the world still go hungry.What is this the case? What can be done about this problem ? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red to average life expectancy of global is given in the bar chart. The data is m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, similarly, so, in addition, in contrast, to begin with, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83815028902 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55631222654 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.811110432 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0909090909 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221436390319 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931045405655 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932974827421 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180495684257 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881606070116 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.