The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007

The bar chart illustrates different activities done by teenagers per week (in hours) in Chester over a period of 6 years from 2002 to 2007.

Overall, teenagers spent most of the time watching televisions in all those years, whereas, they spent the lowest in bowling activities. Moreover, the chart shows that time spent in activities like going to pubs, watching televisions or shopping increased over the years. But activities like doing sports, homework or bowing actually decreased. watching dvds, however, showed a mixed representation.

The chart demonstrates that teenagers spent around 25 to 37 hours in watching television from 2001 to 2007. they spent 17 hours in discos in 2007 whereas it was only 7 hours in 2001. shopping also saw an increase (7 hours in 2001 and 15 in 2007). time spent on homework or sports has seen a decrease over the years with only spending 7 and 2 hours respectively for each task. bowling activity never took more than 4 hours per week in all those years.

teenagers showed an interest in watching dvds from 2001(11 hours) to 2003(17 hours). however, they started spending less time on it in the following years (10 hours).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-16 asmita acharya 73 view
2019-11-06 ziaul1891 78 view
2019-05-26 TEENA MAMMEN 86 view
Essays by user ziaul1891 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Watching
... homework or bowing actually decreased. watching dvds, however, showed a mixed represent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... watching television from 2001 to 2007. they spent 17 hours in discos in 2007 wherea...
^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Shopping
...07 whereas it was only 7 hours in 2001. shopping also saw an increase 7 hours in 2001 an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Time
...ncrease 7 hours in 2001 and 15 in 2007. time spent on homework or sports has seen a ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Bowling
...and 2 hours respectively for each task. bowling activity never took more than 4 hours p...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teenagers
...hours per week in all those years. teenagers showed an interest in watching dvds fro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...dvds from 200111 hours to 200317 hours. however, they started spending less time on it ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94897959184 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66687924323 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1754130967 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355304500912 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134657664759 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106388591333 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242221587148 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12406996882 0.0819641961636 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.