The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007
The graph illustrates the hours each week that adolescents spent on 7 activities in Chester for 6 Years from 2002 to 2007.
Overall, teenagers spent the highest time on watching TV and the lowest on bowling. A gradual increase in hours spent on activities such as going to pubs or discos, shopping and watching television are visible from 2002 to 2007. But time given for doing homework, sports and bowling decreased by 6 years. The hours spent on watching DVD's was fluctuating.
Adolescents spent 25 hours a week to watch TV in 2002 and drastically increased to more than 35 hours a week by 2007. For both shopping and going to pubs, teenagers spent more than 5 hours per week in 2002 and increased to 15 and 18 hours per week respectively by 2007. Adolescents spent less than 5 hours a week for bowling from 2002 to 2007.
For both doing sport and homework, the hours spent by teenagers decreased from 10 to less than 5 and 13 to 7 respectively. Time spent for watching DVD's increased from 11 to 18 hours a week by 3 years(2002 to 2004). Later decreased from 12 to 10 hours per week by next 3 years(2005-2007).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-16 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | ziaul1891 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | TEENA MAMMEN | 86 | view |
- Some argue that it is the responsibility of the parents to teach children about healthy eating habits, whereas others believe that teachers should be responsible for teaching their students how to eat in a healthy way. Discuss both views and give your opi 67
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54455445545 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73804895271 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405940594059 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7042114678 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4545454545 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294593135691 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148860018888 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744354953676 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222106262255 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493667547414 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.5 61.2550243902 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.