The diagram depicts how many people from European Union countries worked in the United States in 1999.
As an overall trend, French demonstrated the lowest point, about 5000 people have worked from this country, while employees from British show the peak rate in which was roughly 5 times more than French ones. Meanwhile, the second rate was occupied by German workers which approximately 20000 people have worked in US. Employees who come from Italy delineated penultimate rate which second fever workers who worked more than 5000 people in US in 1999. Nevertheless, overall 20000 people from other European Union countries were engaged in US in 1999
To sum up, people who was immigrated t US to work purpose show a peak rate, therefore last rate was occupied by French employees.
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperature for Auckland and Christchurch, two sites in New Zealand, and London and Edinburgh, two sites in the United Kingdom.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 84
- fg
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, second, therefore, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 656.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 130.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37664837539 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46821210716 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9330338032 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.2 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144374827334 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095643027968 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660255947619 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120967710315 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065394040013 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.