The bar chart provided presents information about the distance in miles traveled by men and women for six different purposes annually in a specific country.
According to the bar chart, it can be noticed easily that work was the main purpose for men to travel while women tended to go shopping instead.
When it comes to the number of miles traveled in a year by men, they had travel 35000 miles for going to work every day whereas women traveled less than 5000 miles accounting for 30000 miles annually. Days trip was the least purpose for both genders to travel comprising to 10000 miles for men and 7000 miles for women annually. In addition, although entertainment was also not a reason for traveling, its mileage trips data for both men and women was slightly higher than going on a day trip, which constitutes with 15000 and over 10000 miles respectively.
With regards to three other purposes, women spend most of their expeditions for shopping contributing for 30000 miles, which is approximately 2500 miles longer than men. Both genders had responsibility for taking children to school but men slightly traveled less than women at about 1500 miles each year. For the last purpose which is meeting friends, women went 25000 miles for having an expedition with their friend while men just traveled for over 20000 miles.
- the diagram below shows the process of milk production 65
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 90
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97333333333 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47744990357 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.9843711834 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.875 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347022484454 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199196456832 0.103423049105 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878377778191 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262824099611 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744715869887 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.