The bar chart demonstrates the average hours of household chores done weekly by different groups of people such as between two genders or how many children does that person have.
Analysing the bar chart, it is possible to notice that, married women had much more unpaid work hours than married men among all three categories.
With regards to the married women, it can be seen that they got to do a lot of housework regardless how many children they had. For married women who didn't have children, they worked for total thirty hours a week while ones whose families had from 3+ adolescents spent almost double their times to do household works. Nevertheless, even a mother who had one to two children used up 50 hours weekly for taking care of their home.
When it comes to the married men, their working hours compared with women in the same group were much lower and didn't have any variations at all. Furthermore, the more children they had, the less amount of time they spent on household chores per week. The males who had no children took approximately 20 hours to do childcare, housework, and gardening whereas father groups with about two kids and above three kids spend 2 and 3 hours less respectively.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 90
- The maps show the changed of Woodwards University spatial during 1985 until now 84
- Some people claim that what people eat in many Western countries is unhealthy and that their diet is getting worse Critics say that these countries should change their diet What are your opinions on this 79
- Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of the public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. Do you agree or disagree. 89
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...hildren they had. For married women who didnt have children, they worked for total th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...n in the same group were much lower and didnt have any variations at all. Furthermore...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75943396226 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44011125431 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63679245283 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.728465352 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183054515279 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840699931999 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466794194375 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12582509431 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348523632728 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.