The bar chart below shows the number of plagiarism and cheating cases in different faculties between 2017 and 2018.
The chart illustrates the amount of cases of students' cheating and plagiarism in a university between 2017 - 2018. The number is shown at multiple majors in that year.
There is a pattern that the number of plagiarism is more common than cheating. For instance, the Art and Humanities Faculty had five students who plagiarized others' work, but no case of cheating. Another example is Health Science Subject, where cheating is almost halved the other type. In addition, faculties involved in creativy and colleges have a tendency to have lower cases of cheating in exams. To illustrate, the Information and Media Studies, Music and Brescia University College all have no student cheating.
However, the chart also shows some exception with this trend. First and foremost, in Science and Social Science majors, students is likely to cheat more than plagiarize. To explain it, Science Faculty have the cases of cheating doubled the other one. Furthermore, the University College has the amount of plagiarism outnumbered cheating by nearly twelve to one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-25 | Nguyễn Hải Yến | 73 | view |
- In today s world the number of people who work from home is increasing steadily Some people say that working from home increases a worker s productivity To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The bar chart below shows the number of plagiarism and cheating cases in different faculties between 2017 and 2018 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...own at multiple majors in that year. There is a pattern that the number of pl...
^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have no student cheating. However, the chart also shows some exception with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, so, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30952380952 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69971670581 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2521240513 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0909090909 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310509078115 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116628231085 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10471611563 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238794101497 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952104468359 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.