The bar graph illustrates the figure for students choosing to study eight different university subjects in 2005.
It is clear from the chart that the most common choice of female students was social sciences, while science was the highest figure for male students.
The number of women was higher than that of men who registered some subjects including: social sciences, languages and the arts. To specify, social science was by far the most general subject for women, with nearly 25 thousand people which was over 10 thousand than that for men. It is noticeable that females choosing the arts accounted for the number of about 18 thousand which was eightieth as high as its male. Moreover, there were 9 thousand of women participating in the arts, whereas only 2 thousand men did so.
Conversely, sciences and Math were the most popular choices for male students, with around 20 thousand people for each subject, about two to three times higher than female. More men than women also chose literature and law, respectively 15 and 10 thousand. Especially, about 11 thousand people were the figure of both genders choosing humanities.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 56
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country, in millions. 78
- Young people should spend more time on cultural activities such as music or theatre nd less time on sport. How far do you agree with this statement. 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05319148936 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53274168514 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4023125471 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864106212963 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046511967897 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528142944132 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759908293229 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587162794471 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.