The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart compares about how many students chose certain University subjects in 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that Social Sciences and Languages were the most popular courses for females, while Sciences and Mathematics remained the most preferred subjects among boys.
In detail, around 24,000 females chose social sciences, considerably higher than the males at about 14,000. Also, the total (24,000) was the peak level as compared to other subjects. Next came Languages with approximately 18,000 for girls vs 2,000 for boys, making it (2,000) the least total in the year. Sciences stood at just over 20,000 (boys), which was relatively twice as much as the females at around 10,000. As for Mathematics, females stood at 4,000, which was nowhere near as close as males with 18,000.
In contrast, the remaining subjects for both genders were not as popular as the discussed courses. Literature was chosen by 15,000 males, which was a bit larger than the counterparts at 12,000. The net figure for Humanities were equal at 12,000 each for both sexes. While females dominated the arts with 9,000 vs 3,000 (boys), males surpassed Law with 10,000 vs 6000 (girls) respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-02 | thanhhuyen123 | view | |
| 2019-07-21 | Ken95 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-29 | btv999222@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | Ken95 | 78 | view |
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- The graph shows the unemployment rates in the us and japan between march 1993 and march 1999. 79
- some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behavior while others say the amount of time they spend watching TV influences their behavior Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- 01/10/2017 Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities.To what extent 90
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
'..., which was..' is repeated cross the content. Better not to repeat same styles in any essays.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 193 200
No. of Characters: 955 1000
No. of Different Words: 114 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.727 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.948 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.395 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 64 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.545 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.053 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.367 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.602 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with 10,000 vs 6000 girls respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12953367876 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47487305618 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611398963731 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.172725806 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591348569895 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383274134252 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889943240499 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910416429217 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130444270384 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.