The bar graph compares the figure of students who chose to study eight different university subjects in 2005.
It is clear that there are some general differences between men’s and women’s choice of subjects. However, just as many men as women chose to study humanities.
Non-science subjects were more popular with female students. The most common subjects for female students were less technical subjects such as social sciences, languages, literature and humanities. Social science was by far the most general subject for women, with nearly 25 thousand people. However, very few female students chose to study mathematics and law, respectively 4 and 6 thousand students.
Sciences and Math were the most popular choices for male students, with around 20 thousand people for each subject, about twice- three times as many as female students. Almost no men- only 2 thousand- chose to learn languages, nearly one-fifth of women. Very few men chose the arts. In fact, just under a thousand students chose it, approximately a twentieth part of female students.
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country, in millions 67
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country in millions 64
- Young people should spend more time on cultural activities such as music or theatre nd less time on sport How far do you agree with this statement 77
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3550295858 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71528655303 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3779517277 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2727272727 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132145885107 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631786860265 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680663384396 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110962970223 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929285257553 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.