The first chart indicates the numbers of male and female enroll in four evening courses: drama, painting, sculpture, language at classes for adult in 2009, while the second one illustrates the age ranges of people who take part in these courses.
Overall, women tended to participate in different courses more than men did. It is noticeable that the number of aduts at the age of 50 or over sign in these evening courses was higher than any other ages.
In 2009, around 25 males and 30 females enrolled in courses about painting, these figures for drama courses was slight lower, at 10 men and 20 women. There were 20 males applied for language classes, which is just a half of the number of females. Also in that year, the difference between men and women in chosing sculpture was by about 5 people.
Turning to the ages of these participants, we can see that 50 or over years old people are likely to take the these evening course, with the percentage of 42%, followed by the group of 40 to 49 years old, this make up 26%. The proportion of people aged from 20 to 39 is slight lower with nearly 15% and the lowest percentage accounted for is the age under 20, with only 5%.
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 82
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49302325581 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32612086766 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4954367626 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300953308712 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129132111546 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065431781694 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17841333925 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559842375521 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.